The Long Island Serial Killer was active for a period of twenty years, murdering anywhere between ten and seventeen individuals. Despite the notoriety of his crimes, the culprit was never caught. The Claremont serial murders is the name given by the media to a case involving. Spots in Claremont, leading police to suspect that an unidentified serial killer was the offender. Submerged Groin (US spelling), Hunting Island, South Carolina. Groynes that are too long or too high tend to accelerate downdrift erosion,.
![Serial killer long island ny Serial killer long island ny](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125642864/259749263.jpg)
BRET CHRISTIAN: There is a man that the police have been watching from very early on in the investigation, and he appears to be a prime suspect. Vast amounts of resources have gone into watching his every movement, to following him, to surveilling him in all sorts of different ways. BRET CHRISTIAN: I think our community's been lulled into a false sense of security by the - sort of the sly nod and the wink that, 'Look, we really know who's done this. We've been watching him. 'And since we've been watching him there's been no other murders.'
That's actually wrong. There HAVE been other murders - just not any more in Claremont. Is there a plausible reason why the video has only just now been released to the broader public.?
It's strange isn't it. This case is markedly different to others in respect to the suppression of information on the part of the WA Police. Obviously they have their reasons and motives but things that become common information in these kind of cases like how the victims were killed etc are still widely unknown about this case and remain officially unreleased, still, 12 years later. It seems strange. Police have spoken to every single person that set foot in Claremont that night except for him?
And he actually spoke to her, I think that is extremely significant. See I'm on the other end of the scale, I think they're making too much of it. I watch the CI Australia doco last night and all it seemed like was that he might have made a joke or a passing comment that she's reacted to and laughed at, they were jumping from that to 'Oh she clearly recognises this man' I think that's going a little too far, if you filmed half of Northbridge at 2am on a Saturday night hundreds of complete strangers are interacting with each other and probably looking on CCTV like they might have known each other for years. That's just the effects of social clubs & alcohol IMO. I do think whoever it is, if they can even remember that IS them by now, should come forward.
I'm quite befuddled and just a little annoyed that the footage of Jane talking to this mystery man wasn't made public earlier. How is anyone going to remember details of that (at the time totally insignificant) conversation between 2 random people outside of a busy nightspot 12 YEARS LATER? You'd think that if the man in the video had nothing to hide, he would have gone to police 12 years ago and said he was speaking to Jane outside the club that night and they would have identified him then. The fact that this obviously didn't happen leaves me at a loss as to why they didn't make a more public effort to identify this man waaaay sooner. This not wanting to 'narrow the scope of the investigation' excuse just doesn't fly IMO I often think about this case. A few elements of it hit very close to home.
I'm just wondering if Sarah's remains might be up in the hills somewhere - there's a bit of a dumping ground in the bush around mundaring Whoever did this left Jane south and Ciara north. He obviously didn't want to create a pattern or draw attention by sticking to one area to dispose of remains so I guess it kind of makes sense that Sarah might be east in the hills. I really hope they find her. I often think about this case. A few elements of it hit very close to home.
I'm just wondering if Sarah's remains might be up in the hills somewhere - there's a bit of a dumping ground in the bush around mundaring There were actually a series of comments made on one of the blogs on The Australian newspaper's website. The person was posting in the comments section of a blog made by one of the Australian's writers alluding to the whereabouts of Sarah's body and a second blog was written about the person making the comments alone. Very disturbing. There were actually a series of comments made on one of the blogs on The Australian newspaper's website.
The person was posting in the comments section of a blog made by one of the Australian's writers alluding to the whereabouts of Sarah's body and a second blog was written about the person making the comments alone. Hmm, I just read through all of that. It sounds like the person who posted on the blog knew more than they should have. I thought the question about the jewellery interesting & the answer. Wonder if that was common knowledge? Just because this guy was cleared by his DNA doesn't mean he wasn't involved in it. Wouldn't be the first killer engineered someone else to do it to get his kicks watching someone else carry it out.
I really wish they could solve this one. I was the same age as the victims at the time, living on my own and going out partying, even went to Claremont a few times. This really hit home to me at the time and changed how I did things in terms of going out, catching cabs etc. I feel the same way as the above PP. I was 18/19 around the time - the fear felt at the time amoung young women was huge.
The cab thing was a big deal as they thought there was a bogus cab getting around and thats why the girls got in. I actually think about this case often - I really feel for Sarah's family and for Sarah - laying out there somewhere in the West Australian bush, alone, unvisited by loved ones. I hope they find her body soon. How is anyone going to remember details of that (at the time totally insignificant) conversation between 2 random people outside of a busy nightspot 12 YEARS LATER?
You'd think that if the man in the video had nothing to hide, he would have gone to police 12 years ago and said he was speaking to Jane outside the club that night and they would have identified him then. Exactly my point! Seems almost pointless now. I do understand that the police have their reasons, and I do get that some things must be withheld, but surely this footage is not one of them.!?! That is of course if their priorities are catching this guy not trying to save face for someone else. Reading those blog comments is seriously spooky - that guy is either very suss or has wayyyyy too much time and interest in this case. Yeh I read it earlier too I have to say though, I think he's just an eccentric and seems to fancy himself a bit psychic That said - I did get the creeps bigtime when he mentioned Sarah McMahon as I was about to mention her in my last post but deleted what I wrote because (from the police's POV) it's not relevant to the Claremont murders.
She was working at Hugall & Hoile Claremont and went missing after leaving work at 5 one day. I was working at H&H's head office in Malaga at the time and my first thought when we found out she was missing was ' he's back'. I have been curious ever since as to why the police ruled out a connection between her disappearance and that of the other women.
Obviously there's a lot of details that don't get released to the public and I completely understand why but it would be interesting to know where the similarities ended with that case. I dont know anything really about the case, but I did follow it closely also being from Perth. I was I think??27 or so at the time and frequented night clubs myself but not in the Claremont area. I was told many years back by someone who had a relative high up in the force (the were something to do with detectives or forensics I think) anyway I was told some of the horrific things about one of the bodies they did find and the state one was found in and it was absolutely shockingly horrific. I had to report someone I knew, as both the nights of the murders this person was out all night, and later I found blood in the boot of the car (it smelt sooooo foul you couldnt miss it)he said it was from his dogs raw roo meat that got spilt he also sold the car soon after, also I had seen a drawer with womens jewellery in it, including a keyring of a sun very similar to the one they said one of the girls had that was not found.
It was quite scary. I reported this person, but obviously he wasnt the one or else they didnt have enough evidence to take it further. The whole case creeps me out, I wish they would find who did it, as Im sure they are still alive and will be back.